Skip to main content

Full text of "Local Injection of Deferoxamine Improves Neovascularization in Ischemic Diabetic Random Flap by Increasing HIF-1? and VEGF Expression."

See other formats


OPEN Q ACCESS Freely available online 



PLOS | ONE 



Local Injection of Deferoxamine Improves (Gt\ 
Neovascularization in Ischemic Diabetic Random Flap by c^m** 
Increasing HIF-1a and VEGF Expression 

Chen Wang 19 , Yuanyuan Cai 2< *, Yun Zhang 1 , Zhuyou Xiong 3 , Guangzao Li 3 *, Lei Cui 1 * 

1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9 th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China, 

2 Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital, Changzhou, P. R. China, 3 Department of Plastic Surgery, 1 st Affiliated Hospital of 
Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, P. R. China 



Abstract 

Background: Although the systemic administration of deferoxamine (DFO) is protective in experimental models of normal 
ischemic flap and diabetic wound, its effect on diabetic flap ischemia using a local injection remains unknown. 

Objective: To explore the feasibility of local injection of DFO to improve the survival of ischemic random skin flaps in 
streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice. 

Methods: Ischemic random skin flaps were made in 125 mice. Animals were divided into the DFO-treated (n = 20), PBS- 
treated (n = 16) and untreated (n = 16) groups. Surviving area, vessel density, and expression of vascular endothelial growth 
factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-lot (HIF-1 oc) were evaluated on the seventh day after local injection. 

Resu/ts:Jhe viability of DFO-treated flap was significantly enhanced, with increased regional blood perfusion and capillary 
density compared with those in the two control groups. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis demonstrated a 
marked increase in systemic Flk-1 + /CD1 1b~ endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in DFO-treated mice. Furthermore, the 
expression of VEGF and HIF-1 oc was increased not only in diabetic flap tissue, but also in dermal fibroblasts cultured under 
hyperglycemic and hypoxic conditions. 

Conclusions: Local injection of DFO could exert preventive effects against skin flap necrosis in STZ-induced diabetic mice by 
elevating the expression of HIF-1 ex and VEGF, increased EPC mobilization, which all contributed to promote ischemic 
diabetic flap survival. 



Citation: Wang C, Cai Y, Zhang Y, Xiong Z, Li G, et al. (2014) Local Injection of Deferoxamine Improves Neovascularization in Ischemic Diabetic Random Flap by 
Increasing HIF-1a and VEGF Expression. PLoS ONE 9(6): e100818. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100818 

Editor: Michael E. Boulton, Indiana University College of Medicine, United States of America 

Received February 13, 2014; Accepted May 29, 2014; Published June 25, 2014 

Copyright: © 2014 Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits 
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 

Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 81 201 204) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant No: 
1 1ZR1 420300). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. 

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. 

* Email: liguangzhaoby_jy@163.com (GL); cuileijy@163.com (LC) 

<3 These authors contributed equally to this work. 



Introduction 

In diabetic patients, the management of impaired healing of 
cutaneous wounds, such as foot and leg ulcers, represents a 
significant public health burden worldwide [1,2]. Random skin 
flaps are used for treating these wounds and ulcers. However, 
necrosis often occurs in the distal part of random skin flaps in 
diabetic individuals [3-5], which has been attributed to impaired 
ischemia-driven neovascularization under hyperglycemic condi- 
tions. Local administration of angiogenic growth factors, such as 
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [6], fibroblast growth 
factor-2 (FGF-2) [7] , and adult mesenchymal stem cells from either 
bone marrow or adipose tissue, has been documented to be 
effective in improving neovascularization in diabetic random flaps 
[8,9] . However, the safety and use of these approaches remain 
controversial [10], and no efficient therapy is currently available in 
a clinical setting. 



Deferoxamine (DFO), a free radical scavenger and iron 
chelator, has been shown to improve skin flap survival by up- 
regulating VEGF in ischemic flap surgery [11-14]. As a key 
transcription factor, hypoxia-inducible factor- 1(X (HIF-1 a) is 
necessary for the expression of angiogenic growth factors like 
VEGF, and for endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) recruitment to 
ischemic sites in order to form new blood vessels [15]. Recently, it 
was found that the systemic use of DFO increased HIF-1 a 
stabilization and improved age-related decline in HIF-loc 
[3,11,15]. In addition, HIF-1 (X activity was corrected with DFO 
administration by preventing iron-catalyzed reactive oxygen 
species (ROS) and methylglyoxal formation under hyperglycemia 
[3,16,17]. However, it is still unclear if the local administration of 
DFO could correct HIF- 1 oc and VEGF expression in a hypergly- 
cemic environment, and enhance the viability of diabetic random 
skin flaps. 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



1 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 



In the present study, ischemic random skin flaps were made in 
streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice, and DFO was 
injected locally in the skin flap to investigate whether tissue 
necrosis could be rescued after improved angiogenesis. Further- 
more, expression of HIF-lcx and VEGF was detected after DFO 
treatment in skin flap tissue and in skin fibroblasts cultured under 
high glucose and hypoxic conditions. Finally, EPCs mobilization 
in the peripheral circulation was evaluated in response to DFO 
administration. 

Materials and Methods 

Development of ischemic random skin flap in diabetic 
murine model 

One hundred- twenty-five C57/bl6 male mice aged 8— 
10 weeks and weighing 20-25 g were purchased from SLAC 
National Rodent Laboratory Animal Resources (Shanghai, 
China). This study was carried out in strict accordance with 
the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of 
Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The 
institutional review committee of the Shanghai Jiao Tong 
University School of Medicine approved all animal study 
protocols. All mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal 
injections of pentobarbital sodium (20 mg/kg body weight) in 
all surgical procedures, and all efforts were made to minimize 
suffering. Diabetes was induced by intraperitoneal injections of 
streptozocin (50 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in 
50 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.5) for 5 consecutive days 
[18]. Venous blood was collected from the tail for blood glucose 
levels determination 14 days after the first day with STZ 
injection using a OneTouch Ultra portable glucose analyzer 
(Lifescan Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA). Diabetic mouse model was 
considered to be successful when glucose levels were above 
300mg/dl and in the presence of weight loss and polydipsia, 
polyphagia, and polyuria symptoms. 

After diabetes induction, the back's hairs of mice was cut off and 
soaked the remaining hair with water and daub with depilatory 
cream (Shibi, Shanghai, China) uniformly. Three minutes later, 
we erased the cream and repeated the procedure three times, the 
hair was removed completely and a cranially-based peninsular skin 
flap (1.0x3.0 cm) was elevated in the dorsum of diabetic mice 
[19,20], in which the ischemic gradient was proportional to the 
distance from the base. The skin was gently stretched to show the 
cutaneous vessels (Fig. 1A), and the cutaneous vascular architec- 
ture was outlined using a marker pen (Fig. IB). A thin sterile 
silicon sheet was inserted to separate the flap from the underlying 
bed, and the flap was sutured in place (Fig. 1C). Previous studies 
showed that a gradient of oxygen tensions could be generated 
within the flap tissue [15]. 

Local injection of DFO 

DFO dissolved in PBS (0.1 ml) was injected subcutaneously in 
the distal portion of the flap. Different concentrations of DFO (0, 
10, 40, 70, 100, 150 mg/kg) were injected in the flap (Fig. 2A). 
The animals were divided into 3 groups: the DFO group, the PBS 
group and the untreated group. After flap elevation, DFO 
(100 mg/kg, 10 mg/ml, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was 
immediately injected in the DFO group, and every day for three 
days after surgery (Fig. 3 A). The same amount of PBS was 
subcutaneously injected in the PBS group. 



Assessment of the surviving areas of flaps and skin blood 
perfusion 

Seven days after operation, pictures of the flaps were taken 
using a digital camera (HP M425, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, 
CA, USA). Surviving area of flaps was assessed blindly by two 
specialists with respect to gross appearance, color, consistency of 
the flaps and presence or absence of bleeding. The surface area of 
these defined zones was then measured using the Image-Pro Plus 
Software 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA). 

Blood perfusion of the skin flap was detected with a laser 
Doppler perfusion imaging system (Moor Instruments, Axminster, 
UK) 7 days after surgery. The probe was placed on the proximal 
necrosis line and 0.5 cm from the distal necrosis edge of the flap 
for at least 30 s, and the results were recorded as blood perfusion 
units (PU). 

Histology and immunofluorescence 

Seven days after surgery, seven-micron-thick tissue samples 
were harvested from the similar position of the flaps the flap, fixed 
in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and stained with 
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For immunohistochemistry, sam- 
ples from flap tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen; seven- 
micron-thick frozen sections were fixed in cold acetone and 
stained with rat monoclonal anti-CD 31 (1:50, ab7388, Abeam, 
Cambridge, MA, USA) primary antibody, followed by addition of 
FITC -conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000, A- 11006, Invitro- 
gen Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). On one hand, neovascularization 
was assessed by measuring the number of capillaries in 20 fields in 
each mouse on H&E stained slides with high power field (HP) in 
each group, on the another hand, vascular density was examined 
under fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and was 
assessed by measuring the number of CD31+ cells in frozen 
sections. Capillary density was assessed morphometrically by 
examining three fields per section of the flap in six successive 
sections on both the H&E sections and the immunofluorescence 
staining sections after immunofluorescence staining for endothelial 
cells with an anti-CD 31 antibody. All measurements were 
performed by two blinded reviewers. 

Western Blot Analysis 

Cells from flaps were processed by extracting proteins with a 
lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM 
NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, and 0.1% deoxycholate). 
Proteins were separated by 8% polyacrylamide gel electropho- 
resis containing 0.1% SDS and subsequently transferred to 
nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 2% 
non-fat dry milk and 3% BSA in Tris-buffered saline. Rabbit 
anti-HIF-1 alpha (NB 100- 134; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, 
USA), or rabbit anti-VEGF (ab46154; Abeam, Cambridge, MA, 
USA) were added. Blots were developed using an IRDye 
700DX- and IRDye 800CW-conjugated secondary antibody 
(Rockland Immunochemical, Inc., Gilbertsville, PA, USA), and 
proteins were visualized using the Odyssey system (LI-COR 
Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). 

Culture of dermal fibroblasts 

Fibroblasts were harvested from STZ-induced diabetic (n = 6, 
8—10 weeks old) and non-diabetic mice (n = 6, 8-10 weeks old). 
Animals were sacrificed and the trunk skin was removed by sharp 
dissection. Special care was taken to remove the underlying 
adipose tissue. 

Skin biopsies were harvested from diabetic and non-diabetic 
mice (n = 6 in each group). After being washed intensively with 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



2 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 




Figure 1. Vascular pattern of mouse dorsal skin and elevation of the skin flap. (A) The skin was gently stretched to show the cutaneous 
vessels. (B) Outlined cutaneous vascular architecture showing that the skin was supplied by 4 major pedicles arising from the deep circumflex iliac 
arteries (I) and the lateral thoracic arteries (T). (C) Ischemic flap measuring 1.0x3.0 cm was elevated and a thin silicon sheet was inserted to separate 
the flap from the bed. The black arrow indicates the silicone sheet. 
doi:1 0.1 371/journal.pone.01 0081 8.g001 



0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), skin tissue was 
minced and digested with 0.1% collagenase type I (Worthington 
Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ, USA) at 37°C for 2 hours. 
Cells were then centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min and filtered 
through a 100-jim nylon mesh to remove undigested tissue. Cells 
were resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium 
(DMEM, GIBCO, Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) supple- 
mented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone, Thermo 
Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% antibiotics/ 
antimycotics. Experiments were performed using cultured cells at 
the third passage. Fibroblasts from diabetic mice were maintained 
in high glucose medium (25 mM D-glucose) and subjected to 
hypoxia (1% 0 2 , 5% C0 2 ) to mimic the pathological diabetic 
parameters in vivo [9]. Dermal fibroblasts from diabetic or non- 
diabetic mice were treated with 100 jiM DFO for 48 h, and cell 
lysates were used for western blotting [21,22]. 

Mouse EPC mobilization assay 

Peripheral blood (0.4-0.6 ml) was obtained from mice in three 
different group (including normal phase (C57/bl6 male mice 
without any treatment), DM phase (diabetes was induced by 




DFO(mg/kg) 

Figure 2. Dose- and time-dependent effects of DFO adminis- 
tration on the survival of diabetic skin flap. (A) Dose-dependent 
augmentation of surviving area of diabetic flaps upon local injection of 
DFO. Results are shown as means ± SEM. *P<0.01 vs. the 0-70 mg/kg 
groups. (B) Surviving area at different time points of diabetic flaps with 
injection of 100 mg/kg DFO each day. Results are shown as means ± 
SEM. *P>0.05. n = 6. 
doi:1 0.1 371 /journal.pone.01 0081 8.g002 



intraperitoneal injections of strep tozocin for 5 consecutive days) 
and DFO+DM phase (after diabetes induction, a skin flap was 
elevated in the dorsum of diabetic mice, and DFO (100 mg/kg) 
was injected subcutaneously in the distal portion of the flap for 
three days) (n = 5). Erythrocytes were lysed with ammonium 
chloride and separated by centrifugation. Cells were then washed 
with PBS/EDTA and marked using PE-labeled Flk-1 (VEGFR-2; 
eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and FITC-labeled CD lib 
(eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) antibodies. EPCs were 
identified as Flk-1+/CD1 lb- [23]. Then, EPC mobilization was 
analyzed by flow cytometry (Becton Dickson, San Jose, CA, USA). 

Statistical Analysis 

Results are expressed as means ± SEM. SPSS 10.0 (SPSS Inc., 
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Analysis of 
Variance (ANOVA) assuming equal variance (Student-Newman- 
Keul test) was performed to identify treatments different from 
control group, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically 
significant. 

Results 

DFO improved flap viability in a dose-dependent manner 

The flaps were treated with different doses of DFO and their 
surviving area was calculated 7 days after injection. In diabetic 
untreated and PBS-treated mice, severe and extended necrosis in 
the distal part of the flap was observed at 7 days postoperatively, 
accounting for 62.19±9.58% and 61.64±7.63% of the total flap 
area, respectively. In DFO-treated diabetic mice, there was a dose- 
dependent augmentation of the surviving area, being 65.83%, 
83.02%, 90.10% and 89.74% at doses of 10 mg/kg, 70 mg/kg, 
100 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg, respectively (P<0.01 compared with 
PBS-treated flaps; n = 6; Fig. 2A). In addition, there was no 
significant difference in surviving area between the 100 mg/kg 
and 150 mg/kg groups (P>0.05). Therefore, the DFO dose was 
fixed at 100 mg/kg for the subsequent experiments. 

To find a minimal duration for injection, surviving area of skin 
flaps was evaluated with daily administration of DFO at 100 mg/ 
kg for 8 days after flap elevation. The surviving area reached its 
peak after 2 days of DFO injection, and the subsequent DFO 
injections from days 3 to 8 showed no significant improvement in 
surviving area (Fig. 2B). This result indicated that DFO treatment 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



3 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 




Figure 3. Analysis of necrosis and blood flow perfusion of the skin flap. (A) Schematic illustration of DFO injection procedure and evaluation 
of skin flaps. (B) Gross view and color laser Doppler detection of diabetic skin flaps from the DFO, PBS and control groups 7 days postoperation. The 
color scale illustrates variations in the blood flow, from maximal (red) to minimal perfusion (dark blue). (C) Quantitative analysis of blood flow 
perfusion of the flap measured as mean perfusion units ± SEM (*P<0.01). DFO-treated (n = 20), PBS-treated (n = 16) and Blank group (n = 16). 
doi:1 0.1 371 /journal. pone.01 0081 8.g003 



initiated 1 day before and continued for 3 days after flap elevation 
at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day was sufficient to obtain an optimal 
protection against necrosis in diabetic random skin flaps. 

DFO improved flap viability by increasing blood 
perfusion 

Using color laser Doppler imaging system analysis, it was found 
that blood perfusion to the distal part of the skin flaps remained 
lower in the untreated (396.42+14.28 PU) and PBS-treated 
groups (41 7.53 ± 14.89 PU) 7 days after surgery, compared with 
DFO-treated mice (565.03± 13.15 PU) (P<0.01) (Fig. 3). 

DFO improved neovascularization in ischemic skin flaps 

As it was reported that DFO promotes survival of ischemic skin 
flap through neovascularization, we investigated the distribution of 
capillaries in diabetic skin flaps. As shown in Figure 4, samples 
from the DFO-treated group displayed an increased distribution of 
capillary vessels, which exhibited dilated lumen compared with 
vessels in the untreated and PBS-treated groups. Furthermore, 
CD31 -positive cells were more abundant in DFO-treated flaps. 

DFO enhanced production of VEGF and HIF-1a in 
diabetic skin flaps 

Many studies have documented a decreased VEGF production 
in ischemic diabetic wounds, but it is still unclear if the improved 
neovascularization is the result of increased VEGF expression with 
administration of DFO in diabetic skin flaps. Thus, expression of 
VEGF and HIF- 1 a was examined by western blotting. As shown 
in Figure 5, there was no detectable difference in VEGF and HIF- 
Icl expression in the intact skin from each group. However, 
compared with non-diabetic mice, the expression of VEGF and 
HIF- lot was dramatically decreased in untreated and PBS-treated 
flaps (all P<0.01). With the administration of DFO, expression of 
VEGF and HIF- 1 a was higher, and was similar to that of non- 
diabetic normal flaps (Fig. 5). 



DFO restored HIF-1a and VEGF expression in diabetic 
dermal fibroblasts 

Because dermal fibroblasts are the major actors for the healing 
of cutaneous wounds, the effect of DFO on HIF-1(X and VEGF 
expression in dermal fibroblasts cultured under high glucose and 
hypoxic conditions was assessed. Fibroblasts were grown in either 
low (5 mM D-glucose) or high glucose (25 raM D-glucose) 
medium for 2 weeks, and were then exposed to normoxic or 
hypoxic conditions for 3 days. Under hypoxic conditions, DFO 
treatment resulted in a 1.7 -fold and 1.8-fold increase in HIF- lex 
and VEGF expression, respectively, in cells cultured in high 
glucose medium, approximating the levels in cells cultured in low 
glucose medium (Fig. 6). Under normoxia (21% 0 2 ), HIF-loc and 
VEGF levels in cells cultured in high glucose medium showed an 
increase that was similar to the cells cultured in low glucose 
medium with the DFO administration (Fig. 6 A, C). 

DFO promoted increased EPC mobilization 

To examine whether diabetic EPCs retained the ability to 
respond to DFO, EPGs from the peripheral blood were analyzed 
by FACS. Diabetic mice exhibited a marked decrease in systemic 
Flk-1 /CD lib progenitor cells compared with non-diabetic 
mice, indicating a specific impairment of vasculogenesis in diabetic 
mice (6.34±0.32% vs. 0.42±0.06%, P<0.01; Fig. 7B). With DFO 
treatment, FACS analysis demonstrated a marked increase in 
systemic Flk-l + /CDllb EPCs in diabetic mice compared with 
controls (1.85±0.12% vs. 0.42±0.06% EPCs, P<0.05) (Fig. 7A 
B). Thus, increased EPC mobilization was induced by DFO 
administration and may contribute in part to the increased 
neovascularization of the ischemic flap in diabetic mice. 

Discussion 

In the present study, we showed that the local injection of DFO 
improved the viability of random skin flaps in STZ-induced 
diabetic mice, which was accompanied by increased capillary 
density in necrotic area. Expression of VEGF and HIF- lex was also 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



4 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 




Figure 4. Determination of capillary density in diabetic flap 7 days after surgery. (A) Gross view, H&E staining and CD31 immunostaining 
of distal portions of diabetic flaps 7 days after surgery. Quantitative analysis of (B) surviving flap area, (C) capillary density, and (D) number of CD31 - 
positive cells. Results are shown as means ± SEM. *P<0.01 vs. the PBS-treated and control groups (C and D), while *P<0.05 vs. the PBS-treated and 
control groups (B). Scale bar =100 jam. HP = high-power field. DFO-treated (n = 20), PBS-treated (n = 16) and Blank group (n = 16). 
doi:1 0.1 371 /journal. pone.01 0081 8.g004 



increased by the administration of DFO. Furthermore, local 
injection of DFO resulted in an increased mobilization of EPGs in 
diabetic mice. 

Necrosis of skin flaps in diabetic conditions has been attributed 
to chronic hyperglycemia, which leads to defective angiogenesis in 
tissues responding to low oxygen tension [9]. Thus, restoring 
adequate response to hypoxia in ischemic tissue is of vital 



importance to stimulate neovascularization in the flap. In the 
present study, we showed that local administration of DFO 
significantly increased the viability of random skin flaps in diabetic 
mice. Meanwhile, within the DFO-treated diabetic flaps, an 
elevated blood perfusion was detected, which was concordant with 
enhanced capillary density determined by CD 31 immunofluores- 
cence. Furthermore, mobilization of EPCs in the peripheral 



Intact 
Skin 

Flap 

P -actin 



VEGF 



PBS BLANK NDM DFO 



HIF-1 a 




PBS BLANK NDM DFO 




Figure 5. Expression of VEGF and HIF-1 a in diabetic flaps evaluated by western blot 3 days after surgery. Expression of VEGF (A) and 
HIF-1 oc (C) was significantly increased in the diabetic flaps of the DFO-treated group. Semi-quantitative analysis of western blots (B and D). *P<0.01 vs. 
the PBS and untreated groups. NDM: Non-diabetic. n = 7. 
doi:1 0.1 371 /journal. pone.01 0081 8.g005 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



5 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 




DFO PBS DFO PBS 



Figure 6. Western-blot detection of VEGF and HIF-1a production in dermal fibroblasts cultured in normoxia (21% 0 2 ) or hypoxia 
(1% 0 2 ) under different glucose concentrations in response to DFO administration for 72 hours. Addition of DFO in the culture medium 
significantly improved the expression of (A) VEGF and (B) HIF-1 oc in dermal fibroblasts under hypoxia and high glucose conditions. Semi-quantitative 
analysis of western blots (C and D). Results are shown as means ± SEM. *P<0.05. LG: Low Glucose; HG: High Glucose. n = 6. 
doi:1 0.1 371 /journal. pone.01 0081 8.g006 



circulation was greatly increased in DFO-treated diabetic mice 
compared with the control groups. Taken together, these results 
demonstrated that improved viability of diabetic skin flaps by local 
administration of DFO was a consequence of stimulated 
neovascularization. 

As the key transcription factor that mediates the adaptive 
response to hypoxia, HIF- 1 ex has been proved to be a key regulator 
of angiogenic gene expression by binding to a conserved and 
defined hypoxia response element in the genes activated by it 




W Normal DM DFO+DM 



Figure 7. Proportion of circulating EPCs in DFO-treated and 
untreated diabetic mice, as determined by FACS analysis (A). 

Flk1 + /CD11b~ cells represent circulating EPCs. (B) Quantitative analysis 
of EPC mobilization are shown as means ± SEM. *P<0.05. DM: diabetic. 
Normal indicates mice without any treatment. n = 5. 
doi:1 0.1 371 /journal. pone.01 0081 8.g007 



[24,25]. However, it was found that high-glucose conditions 
induced the production of methyglyoxal, leading to the modifica- 
tion of HIF-1 ex coactivator p300, which attenuates the association 
of p300 with HIF- lex, and therefore prevents HIF- 1 -mediated 
gene transactivation. Therefore, DFO could attenuate methylgly- 
oxal production, decrease the modification of p300 by methylgly- 
oxal, and thus normalize hypoxic response of cells exposed to high 
glucose environment by the correction of impaired HIF-lex/p300 
association [3]. However, whether the improved neovasculariza- 
tion induced by DFO in diabetic flaps is the result of increased 
HIF- la accumulation remains unclear. In the present study, we 
found that the expression of HIF- lex was greatly reduced in 
diabetic flaps. With the local administration of DFO, the 
expression of HIF- lex and VEGF recovered to a similar level as 
that in non-diabetic mice, which was in accordance with improved 
viability of skin flaps. It has been reported that hyperglycemia 
attenuates VEGF production [2,3], and decreased VEGF levels 
have been observed in the wounds of diabetic mice [2,26]. Thus, 
with improved HIF- lex expression, VEGF production was restored 
by local DFO injection. 

The repair and regeneration of the vascular system requires 
local vessel remodeling through vasculogenesis and angiogenesis 
[15], during which EPGs are mobilized to the ischemic sites from 
the bone marrow and take part in the formation of new blood 
vessels in injured tissue [27]. Vasculogenesis requires a subtle 
cascade of signaling events capable of mobilizing, homing and 
retaining bone marrow-derived EPCs to induce neovascularization 
in response to up-regulated HIF- lex and local VEGF production 
[28]. However, in agreement with the present study, previous 
studies have demonstrated that mobilization of EPCs is greatly 
decreased in diabetic mice [29,30]. Therefore, the necrosis of 
diabetic flaps may be secondary to decreased EPC recruitment as 
a result of decreased HIF- lex and VEGF expression. The ability to 
stabilize HIF- 1 ex with DFO administration and to retain a normal 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



6 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 



hypoxia response is critical for the guidance and retention of 
reparative EPCs. With DFO administration, angiogenesis in 
ischemic diabetic random flaps was improved as a result of 
stabilization of intracellular HIF-lot in response to hypoxia, by 
which VEGF production and EPCs migration was enhanced [31]. 
These results were consistent with the findings by Chang et al, 
who reported that DFO only promoted neovascularization in 
ischemic areas, and did not produce any neovascularization in 
uninjured skin [15]. 

Dermal fibroblasts play a critical role for regulating contraction, 
extracellular matrix deposition and neovascularization in cutane- 
ous wound repair. Lerman et al. revealed that dermal fibroblasts 
from diabetic mice exhibited impaired migration, VEGF expres- 
sion and response to hypoxia under hyperglycemia [32]. In the 
present study, we observed that diabetic fibroblasts failed to 
produce HIF-1(X and VEGF in response to hypoxia. However, 
with the addition of DFO in the culture medium, expression of 
HIF-1(X and VEGF was restored to the same levels as non-diabetic 
fibroblasts. Thus, this in vitro study suggested that DFO performed 
its angiogenic role through the increase of HIF-1(X and VEGF 
expression in dermal fibroblasts in necrotic flaps in diabetic mice. 

Many findings have reported that DFO could stabilize HIF- 1 a 
and increase VEGF expression [11,15,33]. As a result, DFO 
promoted neovascularization in normal skin flaps in aged mice 
and enhanced wound healing in diabetic tissues [3,1 1,15]. To our 
knowledge, this is the first report about the improvement of the 

References 

1. Vija L, Farge D, Gautier JF, Vexiau P, Dumitrache G, et al. (2009) 
Mesenchymal stem cells: Stem cell therapy perspectives for type 1 diabetes. 
Diabetes Metab 35: 85-93. 

2. Brem H, Tomic-Canic M (2007) Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing 
in diabetes. J Clin Invest 117: 1219-1222. 

3. Thangarajah H, Yao D, Chang EI, Shi Y, Jazayeri L, et al. (2009) The 
molecular basis for impaired hypoxia-induced VEGF expression in diabetic 
tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 13505-13510. 

4. Ceradini DJ, Yao D, Grogan RH, Callaghan MJ, Edelstein D, et al. (2008) 
Decreasing intracellular superoxide corrects defective ischemia-induced new 
vessel formation in diabetic mice. J Biol Ghem 283: 10930-10938. 

5. Zhang T, Gong W, Li Z, Yang S, Zhang K, et al. (2007) Efficacy of hyperbaric 
oxygen on survival of random pattern skin flap in diabetic rats. Undersea 
Hyperb Med 34: 335-339. 

6. Gurunluoglu R, Meirer R, Shafighi M, Huemer GM, Yilmaz B, et al. (2005) 
Gene therapy with adenovirus-mediated VEGF enhances skin flap prefabrica- 
tion. Microsurgery 25: 433-441. 

7. Haws MJ, Erdman D, Bayati S, Brown RE, Russell RG (2001) Basic fibroblast 
growth factor induced angiogenesis and prefabricated flap survival. J Reconstr 
Microsurg 17: 39-42. 

8. Tanaka R, Wada M, Kwon SM, Masuda H, Garr J, et al. (2008) Effects of flap 
ischemia on normal and diabetic progenitor cell function. Plast Reconstr Surg 
121: 1929-1942. 

9. Gao W, Qiao X, Ma S, Gui L (2011) Adipose-derived stem cells accelerate 
neovascularization in ischaemic diabetic skin flap via expression of hypoxia- 
inducible factor-la. J Cell Mol Med 15: 2575-2585. 

10. Epstein SE, Kornowski R, Fuchs S, Dvorak HF (2001) Angiogenesis therapy: 
amidst the hype, the neglected potential for serious side effects. Circulation 104: 
115-119. 

11. Weng R, Li Q, Li H, Yang M, Sheng L (2010) Mimic hypoxia improves 
angiogenesis in ischaemic random flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63: 2152 
2159. 

12. Angel MF, Narayanan K, Swartz WM, Ramasastry SS, Kuhns DB, et al. (1986) 
Deferoxamine increases skin flap survival: additional evidence of free radical 
involvement in ischaemic flap surgery. Br J Plast Surg 39: 469-472. 

13. Green R (1985) Red cell ghost-entrapped deferoxamine as a model clinical 
targeted delivery system for iron chelators and other compounds. Bibl Haematol 
51: 25-35. 

14. Weinstein GS, Maves MD, McGormack ML (1989) Deferoxamine decreases 
necrosis in dorsally based pig skin flaps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101: 559- 
561. 

15. Chang EI, Loh SA, Ceradini DJ, Chang EI, Lin SE, et al. (2007) Age decreases 
endothelial progenitor cell recruitment through decreases in hypoxia-inducible 
factor 1 alpha stabilization during ischemia. Circulation 116: 2818-2829. 

16. Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F (2001) Iron metabolism, free radicals, and 
oxidative injury. Biomed Pharmacother 55: 333 339. 



survival of diabetic skin flaps by local administration of DFO. The 
local delivery of DFO for the treatment of human diabetic necrotic 
flaps may have significant clinical implications for diabetic patients 
[34,35]. Of course, further studies should focus on DFO-mediated 
cellular cascade involving eNOS, SDF-la, and PHD, which play 
roles in the neovascularization in ischemic environment and in 
diabetic-related complications [30,36,37]. 

Conclusion 

In conclusion, our studies demonstrated that a local injection of 
DFO could improve the viability of ischemic random skin flaps by 
enhancing neovascularization in STZ-induced diabetic mice. With 
DFO administration, HIF- 1 a stability was increased and led to an 
increased expression of VEGF, as well as promoted the 
mobilization of EPC in the peripheral circulation. In addition, 
DFO restored HIF- 1 cx-mediated VEGF expression in diabetic 
fibroblasts in response to hypoxia. Thus, local administration of 
DFO may be a safe, easy and alternative treatment for necrotic 
random skin flap in diabetic patients. 

Author Contributions 

Conceived and designed the experiments: GW LG. Performed the 
experiments: YG YZ. Analyzed the data: GW YZ ZX. Contributed 
reagents/materials/analysis tools: GL. Wrote the paper: GW YC LG. 



17. Stremmel W, Niederau G, Berger M, Kley HK, Kriiskemper HL, et al. (1988) 
Abnormalities in estrogen, androgen, and insulin metabolism in idiopathic 
hemochromatosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 526: 209-223. 

18. Westermann D, Rutschow S, Van Linthout S, Linderer A, Biicker-Gartner G, et 
al. (2006) Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase attenuates left 
ventricular dysfunction by mediating pro-inflammatory cardiac cytokine levels in 
a mouse model of diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 49: 2507-2513. 

19. Lu F, Mizuno H, Uysal GA, Gai X, Ogawa R, et al. (2008) Improved viability of 
random pattern skin flaps through the use of adipose-derived stem cells. Plast 
Reconstr Surg 121: 50-58. 

20. Dobryansky M, Galiano RD, Getrulo GL Jr, Bhatt KA, Michaels J, et al. (2004) 
Endostatin inhibits ischemia-induced neovascularization and increases ischemic 
tissue loss. Ann Plast Surg 52: 512-518. 

2 1 . Ghekanov VS, Nikolaychik V (2002) Iron contributes to endothelial dysfunction 
in acute ischemic syndromes. Circulation 105: E35. 

22. Potier E, Ferreira E, Dennler S, Mauviel A, Oudina K, et al. (2008) 
Desferrioxamine-driven upregulation of angiogenic factor expression by human 
bone marrow stromal cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2: 272-278. 

23. Lyden D, Hattori K, Dias S, Costa G, Blaikie P, et al. (2001) Impaired 
recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor 
cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nat Med 7: 1194—1201. 

24. Catrina SB, Okamoto K, Pereira T, Brismar K, Poellinger L (2004) 
Hyperglycemia regulates hypoxia-inducible factor- 1 alpha protein stability and 
function. Diabetes 53: 3226-3232. 

25. Botusan IR, Sunkari VG, Savu O, Catrina Al, Grimier J, et al. (2008) 
Stabilization of HIF- 1 alpha is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic 
mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 19426-19431. 

26. Galiano RD, Tepper OM, Pelo CR, Bhatt KA, Callaghan M, et al. (2004) 
Topical vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates diabetic wound healing 
through increased angiogenesis and by mobilizing and recruiting bone marrow- 
derived cells. Am J Pathol 164: 1935-1947. 

27. Tepper OM, Capla JM, Galiano RD, Ceradini DJ, Callaghan MJ, et al. (2005) 
Adult vasculogenesis occurs through in situ recruitment, proliferation, and 
tubulization of circulating bone marrow-derived cells. Blood 105: 1068 —1077. 

28. Grunewald M, Avraham I, Dor Y, Bachar-Lustig E, Itin A, et al. (2006) VEGF- 
induced adult neovascularization: recruitment, retention, and role of accessory 
cells. Cell 124: 175-189. 

29. Westerweel PE, Teraa M, Rafii S, Jaspers JE, White IA, et al. (2013) Impaired 
endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and dysfunctional bone marrow stroma 
in diabetes mellitus. PLoS One 8: e60357. 

30. Kang L, Chen Q, Wang L, Gao L, Meng K, et al. (2009) Decreased 
mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells contributes to impaired neovascu- 
larization in diabetes. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 36: e47 —56. 

31. Shweiki D, Itin A, Soffer D, Keshet E (1992) Vascular endothelial growth factor 
induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature 359: 
843-845. 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



7 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818 



Effects of DFO on Diabetic Random Flap 



32. Lerman OZ, Galiano RD, Armour M, Levine JP, Gurtner GG (2003) Cellular 
dysfunction in the diabetic fibroblast: impairment in migration, vascular 
endothelial growth factor production, and response to hypoxia. Am J Pathol 
162: 303-312. 

33. Galiano RD, Michaels J 5th, Dobryansky M, Levine JP, Gurtner GG (2004) 
Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. 
Wound Repair Regen 12: 485-492. 

34. Haimovici R, D'Amico DJ, Gragoudas ES, Sokol S; Deferoxamine Retinopathy 
Study Group (2002) The expanded clinical spectrum of deferoxamine 
retinopathy. Ophthalmology 109: 164-171. 



35. Okauchi M, Hua Y, Keep RF, Morgenstern LB, Schallert T, et al. (2010) 
Deferoxamine treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage in aged rats: therapeutic 
time window and optimal duration. Stroke 41: 375-382. 

36. Geradini DJ, Yao D, Grogan RH, Gallaghan MJ, Edelstein D, et al. (2008) 
Decreasing intracellular superoxide corrects defective ischemia-induced new 
vessel formation in diabetic mice. J Biol Ghem 283: 10930-10938. 

37. Gallagher KA, Liu ZJ, Xiao M, Chen H, Goldstein LJ, et al. (2007) Diabetic 
impairments in NO-mediated endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and 
homing are reversed by hyperoxia and SDF-1 alpha. J Clin Invest 117: 1249 
1259. 



PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 



8 



June 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 6 | e100818